Rule 28:
Reasons to exclude a supplier
Primary requirement
- Agencies may exclude a supplier from participating in a contract opportunity if there is a good reason for exclusion.
Application
- Reasons for exclusion include:
- bankruptcy, receivership or liquidation
- making a false declaration
- fraud, corruption and anti-competitive behaviour (for example, bid-rigging, bribery including foreign bribery, collusion, etc)
- a serious performance issue in a previous contract
- a conviction for a serious crime or offence
- professional misconduct
- an act or omission that adversely reflects on the commercial integrity of the supplier or offends against the Supplier Code of Conduct
- failing to pay taxes, duties or other levies
- a threat to national security or the confidentiality of sensitive government information
- the supplier is designated as a terrorist entity in New Zealand under the Terrorism Suppression Act 2002
- human rights violations associated with the supplier or in the supplier’s supply chain
- suppliers sanctioned by the New Zealand government
- failure to disclose or falsely reporting beneficial ownership, where requested
- any matter that materially diminishes an agency’s trust and confidence in the supplier.
- Agencies must not exclude a supplier unless it has evidence supporting the reason for the exclusion.
- Agencies must notify a supplier of its exclusion and the reasons for it.